
Originally Posted by
Silverblaze
One thing I can't seem to understand. Why can anyone question Zaid Hamid? May be because he teaches us how great our past was and therefore we will rise again and should do nothing to reform our ownselves. Be practical people!
I just wanted to put some questions to Zaid Hamid
He keeps blaming the government ( although it is not something to be proud of), but has he realized that when a country's most powerful institution relies heavily on US how can that country completly go against the US? Secondly, Why does he not start with the accountability of Yayha khan, Ayub, tikka, Niazi, Zia and Musharraf? Why every time he lambasts the politicians? He talks of saving ISI and we all should protect our assets but why does he not mention the terrible role of these very agencies in literally selling people to US? Organizing Presidential referendums and political parties and of course abducting MNA's as was done many a times during musharraf's role. If the government closes ISI's political wing isn't it good? Although we all know it can never be closed , but why defend it? Why does he always glorifies dictators? I think many people are annoyed when he uses selective historic facts to justify his claims. For instance he mentioned augusto pinochet( Chile's dictator) and how he revived the economy, but why didn't he mention what followed and many people were still living under extreme poverty and not to forget the Operation condor that was one of the most brutal periods of latin american history that took place just to prepetuate his and other latin american dictators rule at the behest of Amreeka Bahadur.Same thing has been happening in pakistan.
Bookmarks